Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Ezine Marketing ? Smart Ezine Publishing | The Recipe Book

Rewritten Article

Ezines are one of the best-kept secrets apropos statement on the web. Area abroad is it possible to utilize such specific audience for therefore little outlay? As allotment of your business combination if you are cerebration of request Ezines, anew certainty are some tips on the kinds of ads that you may work, as able-bodied as what things to put in them.

Publishers for Ezines will generally speaking accord you the most effective amid three types of ad. They do altered issues and crave altered finances. The aboriginal blazon and the cheapest is the classified ad. Just like everything you can acquisition in bounded magazines, it is a bad abridged edition of why visitors should acquisition your alms attractive. Making a classified advertisement that works able-bodied for you is really a level of a little work and apparently some device and error. Take a look at extra ads in the Ezine that interests you to observe how they rose to the situation.

Next in band could be the subsidized ad. Rather than truth at the basal of the Ezine page, jostling for consumption with the added classified ads, abundant added favorable positioning is got by the sponsored ad. Yes, the manager is allotment your advertising by putting it area you?ll receive added amplitude and added attention. As you spend more and that happens.

The 3rd best may be the forgotten ad. The ad is straight back the manager sends out an appropriate content of the publication, which alone includes your ad, termination more. As capacity imagine you, amount rises afresh for the ad. For abounding net marketers, it?s the band-aid of choice.

Nevertheless, whatever most useful you accomplish for your ads, you moreover charge to accomplish abiding that systems are action to apprehend it. And if you are software the deserted ad format, anew you moreover accept to make sure that figures available the email. Now?s an adequate time for an admonition about the feature of the banderole in your advertising. It power alone be 10% of the words, however you will apparently absorb 50% of the time aloof on the heading. It is that essential. Collect it new, important and make use of the correct choice of consumption avaricious words. ?New?, ?Solve? and ?How to? take about wedding gotten adequate results.

And now to the information. Statement about revolves about the ?three K? type. Aboriginal you ?katch? them (that is your banderole accomplishing its work). Anew you ?keep? them and ?konvince? them. It?s the job of the pleasant to complete these added two parts. Short or long, you take to amass your reader?s assimilation and agent them to an action, whether it is abrogation their e-mail house or matters online.

And aloof to accord inclusion announcement choice to you, take to this: barter appropriate and absorbing pleasant with the ezine manager for a chargeless announcement within their ezine. Publishers are on the point permanently, non-sales position components that may intake their readers. You get to put a joint by the end of your commodity for visitors to appear through to your internet site. It is among the most readily useful types of statement because you?re not begging, you?re advancing beyond as an agog specialist. So it is win-win and no amount ? could annihilation be greater than that?

To know more, please go to: wheel spacer

Source: http://www.lindafitt.com/2013/01/ezine-marketing-smart-ezine-publishing/

billy joel bent new york jets etch a sketch romney sean payton saints bounty program toulouse france

Monday, January 21, 2013

Harbaugh brothers to square off in Super Bowl

FOXBOROUGH, Mass. ? John and Jim Harbaugh grew up around coaching. Playing. Watching. Coaching, moving around America every few years as their father, Jack, picked up assistant coaching jobs. They learned to splice film early. Knew the importance of game plans and motivation. And, like so many sons and daughters, decided eventually to get into the family business.

Now here comes the first brother vs. brother coaching matchup in Super Bowl history.

John's Baltimore Ravens dismantled New England 28-13 here Sunday night. Just hours earlier, Jim's San Francisco 49ers outlasted Atlanta 28-24. Their two teams will meet Feb. 3 in New Orleans for the NFL championship.

[Slideshow: Ravens top Pats to set up Harbaugh Bowl]

It will be the pinnacle for America's first coaching family. John is 15 months the elder and is a coaching lifer. Jim enjoyed a 15-year NFL career as a quarterback before becoming a head coach in the college ranks at the University of San Diego and Stanford. Joe Flacco threw three touchdowns in the AFC title game to help the Ravens reach the Super Bowl. (AP)

"[I'm] overcome with extreme pride for both of them," younger sister Joani Crean told Yahoo! Sports. "[I] can't describe my feelings beyond that. I have two incredible brothers."

About the only downside for parents Jack and Jackie: one of their sons has to lose.

For at least one Raven, it was about vengeance. After the game linebacker Terrell Suggs pointed to the motivation of defeating the hated Patriots, who had won last year's AFC title game over Baltimore.

"Tell them to have fun at the Pro Bowl," Suggs said. "Shut them out in the second half. Arrogant [expletive]. These are the most arrogant pricks in the world starting with [coach Bill] Belichick on down."

Sunday was the ultimate for two coaches to reach the Super Bowl, two hard-fought road wins that required second-half comebacks, each shutting out the home team in the final two quarters.?

[Related: Ray Lewis gets emotional during national anthem]

Here in New England, the Ravens' defense helped force Tom Brady (29-for-54 for 320 yards, one touchdown and two interceptions) into a poor, by his standards, effort. The Pats watched drive after drive stall just outside field-goal range as Belichick went uncharacteristically conservative on fourth down.

It means that the emotional final playoff run of legendary linebacker Ray Lewis will continue as he returns to the Super Bowl for the first time since 2000, when he was the game's MVP. It is also the first appearance of fellow future Hall of Famer Ed Reed, the team's ball-hawk safety.

It was a defensive performance that will be hailed for decades in Maryland. Baltimore was able to mostly contain New England's offense, clearly missing injured tight end Rob Gronkowski, to short-yard plays. The Patriots showed little explosion.

[Related: NaVorro Bowman's defensive play sends 49ers to Super Bowl]

Meanwhile, oft-questioned quarterback Joe Flacco continued a strong playoff run by heating up and shredding the Patriots' secondary that was rattled by the early loss of shutdown cornerback Aqib Talib to a thigh injury. Flacco defeated not just Brady but Peyton Manning and Andrew Luck this postseason.

Flacco finished the game hitting 21 of 36 passes for 240 yards and three touchdowns. He was particularly strong in the second half, leading three touchdown drives to overcome a 13-7 halftime deficit.

As for the hoopla over two brothers facing each other for the Super Bowl, John Harbaugh already wants no part of the storyline.

"Let's cut that out right now," Harbaugh said in the postgame media conference. "We did that last year. It got old last year, did it not?"

Related NFL video from Yahoo! Sports:


Other AFC/NFC title game content on Yahoo! Sports:

? Colin Kaepernick has brains to match Jim Harbaugh's guts
? Ray Lewis has rare chance to go out on top
? Sore loser? Bill Belichick stiffs CBS interviewer, draws Shannon Sharpe's ire
? Bernard Pollard delivers another devastating hit on Patriots

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/nfl--brother-vs--brother--john-harbaugh-s-ravens-beat-patriots--get-super-bowl-date-vs--jim-harbaugh-s--024906414.html

Allegiant Air Melissa Rycroft mega millions Cyber Monday Deals 2012 Sasha McHale Boy Meets World elizabeth taylor

Aaron's Law ? The Reality-Based Community

This is a long post that sketches a system in which we can have about the right amount of digital goods at the right price, and pay the people who make them properly.? IP engineers, lawyers, and economists, have at it: time to stop rearranging deck chairs and steer the ship.?? The central underappreciated insight in my view is that the digital content technology system cannot be fixed by torturing dead-tree rules to fit it: technology rights must be technologically administered.

We should think about this in the larger context of infrastructure investment. In the last century and before, this country was able to channel enormous resources and courage to build stuff? that shaped the quality of life? for the better and that also paid off in enormous economic gains.? I?m thinking of railroads, (less fondly of highways), museums, universities,? water systems, the electric grid?
Not all of that infrastructure was physical: we also invested in all the knowledge in the libraries of those universities and the know-how in the heads of all the people who attended them, weights and measures standards so any 10-32 machine screw will fit the hole tapped with any 10-32 tap, all the music, books and movies, and more.? ?More? especially included a legal system that worked well enough to get those books written and songs played, at least as long as they had to be packaged in something that could be locked up in a room.
Almost all of it is worn-out, obsolete, undermaintained, and failing in so many ways.? The roads are potholed and congested, the electric grid doesn?t connect to where we need to collect energy and too stupid to do what it should, the universities are turning away people who want to learn (my main spring course roster is 20% waitlist and no, a bigger room won?t solve the problem)?? But the most important of these failures, triggered by our ability to encode information as bits instead of ink, is the collapse of the information distribution system, and Aaron Swartz is an appropriate symbol of almost everything that?s wrong with it.? Today I got an overdue notice from the library for a paper book. What?s next, a horsedrawn carriage ride to return it: why, in 2013, should I have to get a book back on a physical shelf for someone else to be reading it??!! Why should someone in East Gulch, with its one-day-a-week, one-room library if it has one, not be able to read it at all? Why should musicians not be able to collect a nickel for their work without selling seats for a live performance?
Now is the time to build an information infrastructure of laws and conventions that will create more value and take fewer? casualties.? First, not just a hat tip, but a sweeping bow to Lawrence Lessig [link fixed 20/I/13], Terry Fisher, Neil Netanel, and the other thinkers who have been exploring this territory over the last decades.
First, the general principles:
(1)? Honesty:? When people decide to use information, they have the right to know what that use really cost (not what it cost to make the first copy, interesting though that might be).? When people generate information, they have the right to know what value their work created or is likely to create.
(2) Privacy: People have a right to use information privately, especially with regard to government.
(3) Efficiency: Independent choices by actors in a free market, correctly informed by prices about costs and benefits (including external costs and benefits) , will almost always beat administrative or authoritarian choices.
(4) Justice: Creators have the right to be paid for their work in amounts commensurate with the value they create.? Consumers have the duty to pay for the costs their choices impose on others. Everyone has the right to free speech as broadly understood under the First Amendment.
(5) We?re all in this together: information is the collective patrimony of society. Taxes paid reflect collective benefits but not necessarily exactly the benefits received by each person.
(6) The criteria for a digital medium property regime is that it be better than what exists, and good enough. It will have irremediable flaws and deficiencies.
Short version and implications: Creators (if they wish) need to be paid proportionally to the use made of their work; consumers of digital content need to have access to digital content at marginal cost, which is in almost every case zero beyond the consumer?s time and wear and tear on her hard drive.? The big fact about consuming digital content is that doing so leaves no less for everyone else; the corollary of this fact is that charging any more than nothing to consumers is wasteful.
Here is a sketch of? the only regime known to me that respects these principles.? Nothing in it exceeds demonstrated capacities of existing technology. Note that it can coexist with conventional copyright for authors who prefer the latter.
A. Beginning in 20xx, there shall be appropriated from general funds to the copyright office the sum of $00? per year for administrative costs and implementation of the program described herein.? Beginning in 20yy,? there shall be appropriated from general funds to the copyright office the sum of $000? annually to be disbursed as ?use-scaled? royalties as provided in the following titles.
B. Any legal person wishing to receive use-scaled royalties for creative work in digital form as author shall place with the copyright office a fair copy of the text, image, recording, etc. and identification sufficient to direct annual royalty payments.? The copyright office shall retain copies and distribute royalties for 00 years after a work is first registered, and inform registrants of attempts to register works already in the system.
C. Any device with access to the internet shall be equipped with software distributed and certified by the copyright office that will, whenever a file is opened:
a. ?Hashcode? or otherwise extract sufficient information to identify the work contained .
b. Transmit the code created under C.a ,? but not who or what opened the file, to the copyright office.? One such transmission of code is a use of that work.
c. Transmission of the file containing a work between devices or persons shall not be a use.
D. The copyright office shall accumulate annually a count of uses for each registered work.? Annual royalties shall be distributed in proportion to the fraction of uses recorded for? each work, divided by the total of uses for all registered works.? Total royalties may be separated into such separate funds for different media [for example, video/movie royalties may result in different per-use payments than music or text] as Congress may from time to time determine.
The copyright office may use statistical sampling techniques to determine the allocation of royalties where appropriate, balancing precision and accuracy of result against administrative cost.
E. The copyright office shall not trace the origin of, nor keep any record of, the individual or device that opened a file thus identified, nor cooperate with any law enforcement or security agency with regard to its records of use.
F. The copyright office shall perform the legal, computer science, and related research required to implement the actions described herein internally and/or by contract as the Register of Copyright may determine.
G. Any person may copy, distribute, read/listen to/watch/mashup/etc., any work registered for use-based royalties without limit of time or place.
H. No provision herein shall replace or nullify any rights granted authors and their assigns under existing copyright law, except that a work in which copyright is claimed shall not be admissible for registration for use-based royalties. Rightful owners of existing copyright who register their works for use-based royalties transfer their rights to the public domain as per G above.
I. Rights to use-based royalties are transferable? among legal persons with notice to the copyright office.

Source: http://www.samefacts.com/2013/01/economics/aarons-law/

lisa lampanelli lisa lampanelli bronx zoo memphis grizzlies celebrity apprentice grizzlies bronx zoo crash

Saturday, January 12, 2013

This Is How Bad the Flu Is This Year

Everyone you know is sick, or getting sick, or they've become a lifeless husk of human skin full of flu germs where there was once organs and bones and blood. Don't believe it? Check out Google's influenza tracker, which shows just how massive this year's spike is. More »


Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/4DoMHrnAteA/this-is-how-bad-the-flu-is-this-year

capybara duggars peter facinelli bobby rush supreme court justices 19 kids and counting danny o brien

Postponement of NuvaRing Litigation Opens Door for New Plaintiffs ...

CRESSKILL, N.J., Jan. 11, 2013 /NEWS.GNOM.ES/ ? The trial date for over 1,000 NuvaRing lawsuits is being extended, feeding rumors that the vaginal ring contraceptive?s manufacturer, Merck, may be ready to enter settlement negotiations. The lawsuits allege that NuvaRing caused serious side effects, including blood clots, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, heart attacks, strokes, and wrongful death. The multidistrict litigation before Rodney W. Sippel of the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri, was originally set to go to trial in May 2013. The extension opens the window for more lawsuits to be filed. But even though a settlement might be closer, it will be months if not years before settlement amounts are established and disbursed. To relieve NuvaRing plaintiffs and attorneys? financial stress, RD Legal Funding, LLC (?RD Legal?) is offering immediate lawsuit financing as soon as settlement amounts have been established.

(Logo: http://photos.NEWS.GNOM.ES.com/prnh/20110803/NY45278LOGO )

NuvaRing, the first vaginal hormonal contraceptive device, was developed by Organon BioSciences, the Dutch chemical giant Akzo-Nobel?s human and animal health business. The flexible plastic ring releases a low dose of etonogestrel (synthetic progestin) and estrogen (ethinyl estradiol) over three weeks.

  • 2001: The FDA approved NuvaRing?which is marketed as a simpler and healthier alternative to a daily birth control pill?for use in the U.S.
  • 2007: Schering-Plough purchases Organon for $14.4 billion.
  • Beginning in May 2007: Complaints are filed in various jurisdictions asserting claims over the marketing and sale of NuvaRing.
  • November 2009: Schering Plough completes its $4.1 billion merger with Merck.
  • 2009: The British Medical Journal publishes two studies finding that women taking third- and fourth-generation progestins are almost twice as likely to develop blood clots as those taking second-generation oral contraceptives. First-generation birth control pills, developed in the 1960s, contained high levels of estrogen and carried a nine-fold increased risk of blood clots. Second-generation pills, developed in the 1970s, dramatically decreased blood-clot risks by combining lower doses of estrogen with the synthetic hormone progestin. NuvaRing contains a third-generation?progestin, etonogestrel, which was developed to better control side effects like facial hair and acne.
  • 2010: More than 5.5 million NuvaRing prescriptions are written in the U.S. NuvaRing generates $559 million in international sales.
  • October 2011: An FDA-funded study finds that of 800,000 American women using some form of birth control between 2001 and 2008, NuvaRing users had a 56 percent increased risk of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism over women using second-generation birth control pills.
  • May 2012: A Danish study published in the British Medical Journal reports that NuvaRing users had a 6.5 times higher risk of developing a serious blood clot compared to women who did not use any form of hormonal birth control; and a 90 percent higher risk of experiencing a dangerous blood clot than women taking combined oral contraceptives containing older forms of female hormones.
  • 2012: NuvaRing?s product information pamphlet claims that other studies have not shown any increased risk of blood clots in NuvaRing users over second-generation users.
  • Through the middle of 2012, the FDA receives 4,974 Adverse Event reports from NuvaRing users.
  • Today: Approximately 1.5 million women worldwide currently use NuvaRing which has not been recalled from the U.S. market.

For more information about post-settlement financing, NuvaRing plaintiffs and their attorneys should contact RD Legal at 1-800-565-5177 or go to http://www.legalfunding.com. Founded in 1997, RD Legal is one of the nation?s leading providers of post-settlement lawsuit funding.

SOURCES

http://www.marieclaire.com/health-fitness/news/birth-control-safetyhttp://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/10/business/10drug.html?pagewanted=all

http://fortworth.legalexaminer.com/fda-and-prescription-drugs/nuvaring-pulmonary-embolism-and-deep-vein-thrombosis-risks.aspx?googleid=301466

http://www.bmj.com/search/nuvaring

http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/Safety-RelatedDrugLabelingChanges/ucm117851.htm

http://www.topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/prescription/3231-nuvaring-dvt-lawsuit-alleges-condition-developed-within-1-month

http://topdruglawsuits.com/lawsuit-settlements/nuvaring-lawsuits/2940-nuvaring-lawsuit-trial-dates-moved-allowing-more-plaintiffs-to-join?

SOURCE RD Legal Funding, LLC

http://www.legalfunding.com

Source: http://news.gnom.es/pr/postponement-of-nuvaring-litigation-opens-door-for-new-plaintiffs-rd-legal-funding-offers-nuvaring-plaintiffs-and-attorneys-post-settlement-financing?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=postponement-of-nuvaring-litigation-opens-door-for-new-plaintiffs-rd-legal-funding-offers-nuvaring-plaintiffs-and-attorneys-post-settlement-financing

al gore la dodgers lawrence o donnell magic johnson jetblue pilot solicitor general neighborhood watch

Friday, January 11, 2013

Geonaute's 360 degree sports camera catches all the action, even our hands on

Geonaute's 360 degree sports camera catches all the action, even our hands on

Sport and action cameras are big business, and even though there are a couple of main players, it doesn't stop other's trying to get a bite of the apple. Geonaute, however, have come at the situation from a different angle. Heck, they're coming at it from every angle, with its 360-degree offering. Equipped with three 8-megapixel wide-angle lenses the camera captures an almost spherical field of view. This might initially sound like a strange idea... after all, who wants all of that in one video, won't it all be warped beyond recognition? The short answer is no, in fact it's much better than you would ever have thought, and we'll explain why shortly. Going back to the camera itself, it looks a little like the innards of those security cameras you find in government buildings etc that peer at you ominously. However, in this case, the three lenses have color detail around them which makes them look anything but sinister, and the circular base section might look a little large, but in fact it's light in the hand -- and actually helps it sit quite comfortably atop a helmet.

In 360 video mode the advertised resolution is up to 2,048 x 1,024. In photo mode you'll get single shot, burst and time-lapse modes with a top resolution of 4,096 x 2,048. The actual FOV is 360 degrees on the horizontal, and 150 degrees vertically, but the end result is a fairly complete viewing sphere. The 3,000 mAh battery should be good for two hours of footage, and the microSD card slot will take cards of up to 32GB. While there is a waterproof housing, the camera itself will take the elements on pretty well thanks to its IPX7 rating. Read on after the break for more impressions.

Continue reading Geonaute's 360 degree sports camera catches all the action, even our hands on

Filed under:

Comments

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2013/01/10/geonautes-360-degree-sports-camera/

Girl Meets World Jason Babin Nolan Daniels angus t. jones monday night football monday night football SEC Championship Game 2012